Lawyers for an unborn child are seeking the fetus’s release from jail. How did the unborn child end up behind bars? Why do lawyers think the mother should be released on behalf of her child?

And what did the court say about the request?

What Put a Woman (and Her Unborn Child) Behind Bars?

On July 23, 2022, Natalia Harrell, 24, was six weeks pregnant when she went out for a night of clubbing on South Beach in Miami, Florida.

According to reports, she was out with a group of friends and acquaintances which included Yvette Borcela, 28. Harrell was reportedly annoyed with Borcela while in the club. When the group of seven piled into an Uber, the two women began to argue.

Harrell reportedly said to Borcela, “You don’t want this; you don’t want me to go in my purse.”

Harrell pulled out a gun and fired one shot at Borcela, killing the mother of three.

Multiple witnesses saw the encounter, and the incident was caught on a camera inside the Uber. The video shows the driver stopping the vehicle after the shot and the occupants fleeing the scene, except for Borcela.

Days later, Harrell was arrested and charged with second-degree murder. She faces a maximum sentence of life in prison and a $10,000 fine.

Since her arrest, Harrell — and her unborn child — have been held without bond at the Miami-Dade jail.

Now, the baby’s father is trying to get Harrell and the baby released.

Related: If You’re Arrested for a Crime, Immediately Take These 6 Steps

A Petition To Release the Unborn Child From Jail

In February 2023, the unborn child’s father hired attorney William N. Norris to represent the fetus. Norris filed a petition for Harrel, who is now eight months pregnant, to be released on house arrest with permission to leave for doctor’s visits.

Norris claims that the fetus is being unlawfully detained and that the mother has been denied “proper and continual prenatal medical care and nutrition.” James Reyes, the director of the Miami jail claims Harrell and her unborn baby have received adequate nutrition and prenatal care while in their care.

But Norris says the unborn child has rights that are being violated.

Norris’s argument points to recent changes in both national and Florida laws that give constitutional rights to an unborn child.

Related: What to Ask During a Free Consultation with a Lawyer

What Is the Legal Reasoning?

Norris argued to the court that, “the Florida Legislature has expressed a clear intent to afford certain protections to unborn children.”

Norris claims that Florida has passed laws with the intent to protect the lives of unborn children, and that in the wake of the reversal of Roe V. Wade, unborn children have constitutional rights that need to be protected. He believes two Florida laws highlight this fact.

Florida House Bill 5 bans abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis described the bill as protection for unborn babies saying, “House Bill 5 protects babies in the womb who have beating hearts, who can move, who can taste, who can see, and who can feel pain.”

Another Florida law outlines murder charges for killing an unborn child. Florida Statute 782.09 says individuals can be charged with murder for killing an unborn child by injuring the mother.

Norris points to these laws in his argument for releasing Harrel and her unborn child. He told TODAY.com, “An unborn child is accepted as a ‘person’ in many respects under the law.” Norris made the argument that Harrel’s unborn child should have protection. The filing claims the unborn child’s, “constitutionally protected due process rights have been clearly violated.”

But did the court agree?

Related: Get Good Legal Representation by Asking This One Question

What Did the Court Say?

Florida’s 3rd District Court of Appeals rejected Norris’ argument.

As reported by NBC Miami, the court issued an 11-page ruling saying Harrell’s unborn child is not unlawfully detained because it exists inside its mother, who is lawfully detained. The court didn’t appear to fully dismiss the petition based on merits and said the facts of the case need to be established in the lower courts first.

The rights of unborn children will remain a developing area of the law, and Norris plans to continue to fight to free the unborn child. He plans to file an emergency motion in the circuit court.

Harrell’s next court date for the murder charge is March 7, 2023.

Get Legal Advice on Complex Cases

The law can be complex and difficult to navigate. Make sure you have an attorney by your side who knows how to interpret the law and fight for your rights. For civil or criminal legal advice, schedule a free consultation with attorney TJ Grimaldi today. Request your consultation or call 813-226-1023 today.

TJ Grimaldi is proud to stand with the victims of gun violence. As the Executive Director and Board Member of The Oulson Family Foundation, TJ works to help kids get what they need in the wake of being impacted by gun violence. Learn more about The Oulson Family Foundation and see how you can help victims of gun violence.

The true-life story sounds almost too outrageous to be a TV movie plot. A prominent attorney is accused of killing his wife and son, staging his own murder, and committing roughly 100 crimes.

What did Alex Murdaugh do to lead to more than 100 criminal charges against him?

Murder at the Murdaugh’s

On June 7, 2021, Alex Murdaugh called 911. Murdaugh was a prominent local attorney, and his family was well-known in the Lowcountry region of South Carolina. Murdaugh’s family had a long history in politics. His father, grandfather, and great-grandfather were each elected as top prosecutors in the area.

The community was shocked to learn that Murdaugh called 911 to report that he had found his wife, Margaret Murdaugh, and their youngest son, Paul Murdaugh, 22, shot and killed in the yard around their home.

Murdaugh says he was not home at the time of the killings, and no one was initially charged in the murder.

Related: Dealing With the Media During a High-Profile Case: What to Expect

A Roadside Shooting

Three months after the murders, another shooting occurred. On September 4, 2021, Murdaugh said he pulled over to the side of the road when his black Mercedes-Benz SUV got a flat tire. He said a truck passed by, turned around, and then fired shots at him.

A bullet hit Murdaugh in the head, causing a non-life-threatening injury.

Within two weeks, authorities announced they had a suspect in the shooting — and that they believed the roadside shooting was planned by Murdaugh.

Authorities alleged that Murdaugh hired a man to kill him so his older son could collect his life insurance policy. The man who shot Murdaugh, Curtis Edward Smith, was arrested on charges of assisted suicide, assault and battery of a high aggravated nature, pointing and presenting a firearm, insurance fraud, and conspiracy to commit insurance fraud.

On September 16, Murdaugh was also arrested.

He was charged with insurance fraud, conspiracy to commit insurance fraud, and filing a false police report.

Before Murdaugh was charged, he released a statement saying he was entering rehab and resigning from his family’s law firm. On the same day, his firm — Peters, Murdaugh, Parker, Eltzroth & Detrickhe — released a statement that said Murdaugh was accused of misappropriating company funds.

A Slip and Fall Leads to a Death (and Criminal Charges)

Years before the shootings, another death occurred at Murdaugh’s home.

In 2018, the Murdaugh’s long-time housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield died in what was described as a “trip and fall accident” at the family’s home.

At the time, Murdaugh told Satterfield’s sons he would file a personal injury lawsuit on their behalf. Murdaugh said he would sue himself to collect on his personal liability insurance and then provide funds to the sons.

According to reports, Murdaugh made a secret deal without the son’s knowledge and may have collected up to $4.3 million. The sons should have received more than $2.7 million from the deal, but Murdaugh is accused of keeping it all, according to reports by NBC News.

On October 14, 2021, an investigation into the case led to Murdaugh being charged with two felony counts of obtaining property by false pretenses and being arrested.

Murdaugh’s Long List of Criminal Charges

The charges were just the beginning. Over the next few months, Murdaugh was charged with almost 100 more crimes, according to reporting by NBC News.

Murdaugh was charged with a variety of crimes involving fraud and financial crimes, along with two counts of murder.

  • November 19, 2021: 27 charges that include breach of trust with fraudulent intent, obtaining signature or property by false pretenses, money laundering, computer crimes and forgery
  • December 9, 2021: 21 charges that include breach of trust with fraudulent intent, computer crimes, money laundering, and forgery
  • January 21, 2022: 23 charges that include breach of trust with fraudulent intent and computer crimes
  • March 16, 2022: 4 charges related to a scheme to defraud multiple insurance companies
  • May 4, 2022: 4 charges related to financial crimes
  • June 28, 2022: 2 charges related to criminal conspiracy and narcotics offenses (Curtis Edward Smith, who shot Murdaugh, was charged with Murdaugh and accused of conspiring to purchase and distribute oxycodone.)
  • July 14, 2022: 2 charges for the murder of Murdaugh’s wife and son
  • August 19, 2022: 9 charges related to money laundering and computer crimes
  • December 16, 2022: 9 charges related to tax evasion

Most notable among the many charges against Mudaugh were the two counts of murder.

Related: If You’re Arrested for a Crime, Immediately Take These 6 Steps

Murdaugh Charged with Murder, Facing Trial and Life In Prison

Murdaugh is currently on trial for the murder of his wife and son.

As of February 6, 2023, the trial entered its third week. Prosecutors had called more than 20 witnesses from a growing list of 255 potential witnesses, according to USA Today.

If convicted on the murder charges, Murdaugh faces 30 years to life in prison without parole. Prosecutors did not choose to seek the death penalty.

Get Expert Legal Advice

Whether you are facing one or 100 charges, you need a trusted attorney by your side to guide you through the legal process and ensure you get the best possible outcome in your case. If you are facing criminal charges, talk to an experienced criminal defense attorney today. Talk to TJ Grimaldi about the details of your case. Request your consultation or call 813-226-1023 today.

By now the country knows Tyre Nichols’ name and what happened to him in the moments that led up to his death. Footage has been released to the public showing multiple Memphis police officers brutally attacking Nichols. Five of the officers involved in the incident are now facing criminal charges.

What do the charges mean? And, will anyone else be charged with crimes in the case?

What Happened During the Traffic Stop?

On January 7, 2023, 29-year-old Tyre Nichols was on his way home from photographing a sunset at a local park when he was stopped by the Memphis Police Department. Police say they stopped Nichols for reckless driving.

Body cam footage from the incident shows what happened next. Police pulled Nichols from the car. After a struggle, police deployed pepper spray and a TASER. Nichols ran from the scene. Police later found Nichols and attempted to place him under arrest.

Video from the incident showed officers repeatedly hitting and kicking Nichols. After the abuse stopped, Nichols appeared to fall in and out of consciousness as emergency medical response workers arrived but failed to immediately administer care.

Nichols was eventually taken to a hospital, and three days later, he died from his injuries.

Nichols’ family says an independent autopsy found that Nichols suffered from “extensive bleeding caused by a severe beating.”

So, who is going to be held accountable for Nichols’ death?

Five Police Officers Face Criminal Charges

After Nichols’ death, the Memphis Police Department announced that they were conducting an internal administrative investigation into the matter, and The U.S. Department of Justice announced it opened a civil rights investigation with the FBI. On January 20, five of the officers involved were fired.

Six days later, on January 26, each of the five fired officers were criminally charged.

Tadarrius Bean, Demetrius Haley, Desmond Mills, Jr., Emmitt Martin III, and Justin Smith were arrested and held on bond, which ranged from $250,000 to $350,000.

The five police officers were officially charged with:

  • Second-degree murder
  • Aggravated assault
  • Aggravated kidnapping
  • Official misconduct
  • Official oppression

Of the charges, second-degree murder is the most serious.

Related: Dealing With the Media During a High-Profile Case: What to Expect

What Is Second-Degree Murder? What Are the Consequences?

Second-degree murder charges are a step below the most serious charge of first-degree murder. In Tennessee, first-degree murder is defined as the “intentional killing of another” and carries the possible punishment of life in prison or the death penalty.

Nichols’ stepfather, Rodney Wells, told the AP he and RowVaughn Wells, Nichols’ mother, had pushed for first-degree murder charges but were satisfied with the indictment because it included additional charges, as reported by CBS News.

In Tennessee, second-degree murder is a Class A felony. It is defined as one of two types of killings:

  • A knowing killing of another
  • A killing of another caused by the unlawful sale of drugs

In Tennessee, second-degree murder is punishable by 15-60 years in prison and a fine up to $50,000.

Officers face these potential consequences in addition to the punishment that could arise for the other four charges.

Will Anyone Else Face Charges?

On January 30, the Memphis Police Department announced that two more officers were relieved of duty pending an investigation. One of the officers, Preston Hemphill was involved in the initial stop and reportedly fired a TASER at Nichols. Hemphill was not at the scene of the second incident where officers assaulted Nichols.

The name of the second officer involved in the investigation has not been released.

In addition to the investigation into other police officers involved with the incident, three fire department personnel have been fired, according to a statement from Memphis Fire Department.

Two first responders and a lieutenant — Robert Long, JaMichael Sandridge, and Michelle Whitaker — were terminated after an internal investigation concluded that the individuals “failed to conduct and adequate patient assessment of Mr. Nichols.”

While two people are under investigation and three more have been fired, no one else has been criminally charged in Nichols’ death outside of the five original officers at this time.

It doesn’t mean others won’t face criminal charges.

The Shelby County District Attorney’s Office is continuing its investigation. “We are looking at all individuals involved in the events leading up to, during, and after the beating of Tyre Nichols. This includes the officer present at the initial encounter who has not — so far — been charged,” they said in a statement.

Related: What’s the Difference Between a Civil and Criminal Case? 

Will There Be Civil Wrongful Death Charges?

Nichols’ family has retained civil rights attorney Ben Crump. Crump is a high-profile attorney who has represented many families in wrongful death cases involving deadly police use of force. He represented the families of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, and Ahmaud Arbery.

While no civil case has been filed at this time, it is likely that Crump and Nichols’ family will file a wrongful death lawsuit against one or more of the individuals or organizations involved in the incident.

Related: Examples of Wrongful Death Cases

Get Expert Advice on a Criminal or Civil Charges

Both criminal and civil charges are serious matters. If you or a loved one are involved in litigation, talk to an experienced attorney right away. An experienced attorney will fight for you to get fair due process of the law and protect your rights. If you have questions about a pending legal matter, schedule a free consultation with TJ Grimaldi. Request your consultation or call 813-226-1023 today.

It’s been more than a year since a gunshot unexpectedly discharged on the set of the movie Rust. The shot, fired by actor Alec Baldwin, tragically hit and killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.

Now, the actor will be charged with involuntary manslaughter. What do the charges mean, and what potential consequences await Baldwin?

What Happened on Set?

On October 21, 2021, the crew for the movie Rust gathered in a desert outside of Santa Fe, New Mexico. Actor Alec Baldwin was filming scenes with the crew, including cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.

Away from the filming location, Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, the armorer and props assistant, took out a .45 Long Colt, according to reporting by VOX. She looked inside the gun barrel and saw what she believed to be dummy bullets. Gutierrez-Reed gave the gun to assistant director and production safety coordinator David Halls who took the gun to the filming area.

Safety protocols say Gutierrez-Reed was required to check the gun again before it was given to Baldwin to use in a scene. Gutierrez-Reed said she planned to do so, but she wasn’t called to examine the gun a second time. Baldwin wasn’t scheduled to use the gun in the scene, but he picked it up to rehearse an unscheduled scene.

Instead of calling on Gutierrez-Reed when Baldwin went to use the gun, Halls yelled “cold gun,” indicating that the gun wasn’t loaded with live ammunition, then handed the gun to Baldwin.

Baldwin says he pointed the gun and pulled the hammer back when the gun suddenly discharged on its own, hitting Hutchins and Joel Souza, the movie’s director.

Whether or not the gun went off on its own has not been determined. Baldwin stands by his statement that the gun went off on its own. The FBI conducted multiple tests to see if the gun could go off without pulling the trigger, but they were unable to get the gun to go off at all. How the gun went off — and why it contained live ammunition — is still unknown, according to reporting by VOX.

So, who is responsible for the terrible accident?

Who Should Be Responsible?

The fatal gunshot on October 21 wasn’t the first time there were safety issues on the set of Rust. According to a report by the New Mexico Occupational Health & Safety Bureau (OHSB), there were multiple safety issues on set, including two other accidental gun discharges and an incident where a special effects explosive device accidentally exploded.

Lane Luper, one of Hutchins’s camera assistants, quit the day before Hutchins’s death, citing safety violations as one of the reasons in her resignation email. Another crew member quit for similar reasons on the same day.

Producers of the film (which include Baldin) were cited for creating unsafe conditions on set that led to Hutchins’ death. The production company was fined $136,793 by OHSB for workplace safety violations, which is the maximum allowable fine.

Multiple civil lawsuits have also been filed related to the Rust shooting. Most significantly, a wrongful death lawsuit filed by Hutchins’ family against Baldwin, the film’s production companies, its producers, and other key members of the crew was settled.

But until now, no person or group has faced criminal charges.

Related: What’s the Difference Between a Civil and Criminal Case? 

Who Is Being Held Criminally Liable?

On January 21, 2023, prosecutors said they will charge Baldwin and Gutierrez-Reed with two counts of involuntary manslaughter in the death of Hutchins. The pair will not be arrested, although they will be criminally charged.

Involuntary manslaughter describes cases where the defendant had no intention to kill another person but their actions led to the death of another person. In New Mexico, the charges hold serious consequences.

If convicted, both Baldwin and Gutierrez-Reed face up to five years or 18 months in prison. If the jury finds the pair guilty, the jury will choose between two types of manslaughter charges. One includes a firearm enhancement and carries a mandatory five-year sentence. Without the firearm enhancement, the pair would face up to 18 months in prison.

Halls, the production safety coordinator, may have been included in the criminal charge, but he chose to plead guilty to a misdemeanor charge of negligent use of a deadly weapon.

Now Baldwin and Gutierrez-Reed will have to choose to settle the case out of court or move forward with a trial to attempt to prove they shouldn’t be responsible for Hutchins’ death. They may attempt to point the finger at another person or the production company.

Related: Dealing With the Media During a High-Profile Case: What to Expect

Talk to a Criminal Defense Attorney

Being charged with a crime is a serious situation. If you or someone close to you has been arrested for a crime, talk to an experienced criminal defense attorney right away.

TJ Grimaldi has worked with criminal cases of all types and sizes. From minor citations to large-scale cases, he works closely with clients to help them understand the legal process and fight for their innocence. Talk to an experienced criminal defense attorney today. Request your consultation or call 813-226-1023 today.

Unfortunately, school shootings aren’t anything new in the United States. But what happened at an elementary school in Virginia was extra tragic and unsettling. A school shooting occurred, and the shooter was only six years old.

What happens when a young child uses a gun to shoot their teacher? And, who is responsible for such a terrible incident?

What Happened in the First-Grade Classroom?

With school back in session after the holidays, 25-year-old Abigail Zwerner was leading her classroom of first graders at Richneck Elementary School in Newport News, Virginia. Close to twenty students were in her classroom.

Zwerner was interrupted while leading her lesson when a six-year-old boy took a gun out of his backpack and pointed it at her. The boy fired one shot and hit Zwerner twice.

As Zwerner held up her hands, the bullet went through her hand and into her chest.

What Happened After the Shooting?

After being shot, Zwerner quickly moved her students into a classroom across the hall.

According to police reports, another school employee entered the room and attempted to restrain the boy who fired the gun. The boy was being combative and struck the employee. When police arrived, the school employee was physically restraining the young child.

The teacher was taken to the hospital. Zwerner was initially listed in critical condition and is now expected to recover from her injuries.

The six-year-old boy was taken into police custody. He was taken to a hospital for an evaluation and then was held under a temporary detention order.

Now, what will happen to the six-year-old shooter?

Related: If You’re Arrested for a Crime, Immediately Take These 6 Steps

Will the Six-Year-Old Face Consequences?

The shooting took place in Virginia and is bound by Virginia law. According to reporting by CNN, Virginia doesn’t have a statutory age limit that would prevent the boy from being charged, but other legal rules may prevent the state from prosecuting the child.

According to the “infancy defense,” very young children are said to be unable to be held liable for a crime. The defense is under the assumption that children cannot have criminal intent in the way that adults can.

Another reason the child may not face charges is that a defendant must be found competent to stand trial in Virginia. The defendant must be able to understand the legal proceedings and assist lawyers in their defense. A six-year-old would be unable to meet this criteria.

It would also be difficult to hold the child in any type of juvenile detention center. In Virginia, children must be 11 to be held in custody at a state facility.

At this time, it seems unlikely that the child will face any legal consequences, although his case could result in required child residential treatment or wraparound support services.

Will the Parents Face Consequences?

According to reporting, the boy lived with his mother who legally purchased the firearm used in the shooting. The question is whether or not the mother could be liable for her child taking the gun and using it to shoot someone.

It isn’t unprecedented for a parent to face consequences after a child finds a gun in the house and uses it to harm others. Our blog has covered two such stories.

A mother of a two-year-old faced manslaughter charges when her daughter took an unsecured gun and used it to shoot and kill her father. While this case was believed to be a terrible accident, the mother was charged for her child’s actions.

In another case, the parents of 15-year-old Ethan Crumbley faced four counts of involuntary manslaughter after their son took a gun they purchased for him and used it to kill four students at his school.

In those cases, the parents were liable because they did not store the gun safely away from their children. In the case of the six-year-old shooter, the mother could face charges if it’s found that she had the gun in an unsecured location, as reported by FOX News.

According to Virginia Law 18.2-56.2, “any person to recklessly leave a loaded, unsecured firearm in such a manner as to endanger the life or limb of any child under the age of fourteen,” is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. The punishment for a Class 1 misdemeanor in Virginia is up to twelve months in jail and/or a fine up to $2,500.

Whether or not someone will be charged with a crime in the first-grade classroom shooting will depend on Virginia state prosecutors.

If you or someone you know is facing potential legal charges, talk to a criminal defense attorney as soon as possible to weigh your options and know what to expect. Talk to TJ Grimaldi today. Request your consultation or call 813-226-1023.

Related: Misdemeanor vs Felony: What’s the Difference? 

Standing With Victims of Gun Violence

TJ Grimaldi stands with the victims of gun violence. As the Executive Director and Board Member of The Oulson Family Foundation, TJ works to help kids get what they need in the wake of being impacted by gun violence. The Oulson Family Foundation was created to honor the life and legacy of Chad Oulson, whose life ended in a senseless act of gun violence.

Learn more about The Oulson Family Foundation and see how you can also help victims of gun violence.

After nine long weeks, a suspect has been arrested in the brutal killings of four University of Idaho students. Who is the suspected killer, and what evidence is there to tie him to the scene of the crime?

What Happened on That Terrible Night?

On November 13, four friends and students at the University of Idaho went out for a night of fun.

Ethan Chapin, 20, and Xana Kernodle, 20, who were dating, went to a party together at the Sigma Chi frat house. They arrived back at the house where Kernodle lived with her four roommates.

Two of Kernodle’s roommates, Kaylee Goncalves, 21, and Madison Mogen, 21, arrived home shortly after the couple at around 2:00 AM. The lifelong friends had been out at a bar and stopped for food on their way home.

Two other roommates were already in the three-story townhouse and had been home since about 1:00 AM.

At around 4:00 AM, someone else entered the townhome. Likely entering through an unlocked sliding glass door, the person went to the second and third floors of the building and stabbed and murdered Chapin, Kernodle, Mogen, and Goncalves.

The two roommates on the first floor of the townhome were not harmed during the incident.

How Did Police Catch The Suspect?

It took weeks, but police now believe they have the person who committed the heinous murders.

Bryan Kohberger, 28, was arrested and charged with four counts of first degree murder.

Kohberger was arrested at his parents’ home in Pennsylvania where he was visiting them for the holidays. Kohberger is a Ph.D. student at Washington State University studying Criminal Justice and Criminology. Washington State University is less than ten miles from the University of Idaho.

Police believe Kohberger is the killer based on their findings, as reported by the New York Times.

  • Investigators found a tan leather knife sheath at the scene of the crime. DNA from the sheath was tied to DNA collected from Kohberger’s parents’ home in Pennsylvania.
  • Footage from multiple sources shows a white Hyundai Elantra making multiple passes by the house between 3:29 AM and 4:20 AM on the night of the murders. Kohberger’s vehicle matches the description of the white Hyundai Elantra.
  • Phone records show that Kohberger visited the neighborhood of the crime scene 12 times the night before the murders.
  • One of the two surviving roommates said in an affidavit that she saw someone in the house the night of the murder. She said he had on a mask covering his mouth and nose and described him as, “as 5’ 10″ or taller, male, not very muscular, but athletically built with bushy eyebrows.” Kohberger fits the description.

Because Kohberger was arrested in Pennsylvania for charges he faces in Idaho, he needed to be extradited. Kohberger waived his extradition rights in the brief hearing and was moved to the state where he now faces serious charges.

Related: If You’re Arrested for a Crime, Immediately Take These 6 Steps

What Charges Does Kohberger Face?

Kohberger has been charged with four counts of first-degree murder and one charge of felony burglary.

At a press conference, Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson said the felony burglary charge  involved, “entering the residence with the intent to commit the crime of murder.” Idaho Code 18-1401 states that “every person who enters any house, room, apartment, tenement, store, shop, warehouse, mill, barn, stable, outhouse, or a building, tent, vessel, vehicle, trailer, airplane, or railroad car with intent to commit any theft or any felony is guilty of burglary.” The maximum penalty for felony burglary is ten years in prison.

But the consequences for the felony burglary pale in comparison to the consequences for the four first degree murder charges.

In Idaho, the maximum penalty for first-degree murder is life in prison or the death penalty.

Related: What Does It Take to Be an Attorney for a High-Profile Case? 

Will Kohberger Be Convicted?

Kohberger’s public defender, Jason LaBar, issued a statement indicating that Kohberger wants to fight the charges. The statement read, “Mr. Kohberger is eager to be exonerated of these charges and looks forward to resolving these matters as promptly as possible.”

While there is growing evidence that ties Kohberger to the murders, there are some big pieces of the picture that are still missing.

There is no murder weapon and no motive.

Kohberger’s legal team may choose to fight to exonerate Kohberger at trial. At this time, it is more likely that they may try to prove that there isn’t enough evidence to convict Kohberger than to try to plead guilty by insanity. Michael McAuliffe, a former federal prosecutor and elected state attorney, told Newsweek that Idaho state law does not allow suspects to plead not guilty by insanity.

We will have to wait and see if more evidence is uncovered and what type of defense Kohberger’s legal team puts together as Kohberger faces life in prison or the death penalty.

Related: Dealing With the Media During a High-Profile Case: What to Expect

Get Trusted Representation in a Criminal Case

All accused criminals deserve fair due process of the law. If you find yourself facing criminal charges, make sure you have an attorney who can fight for your best interests. Talk to a criminal defense attorney as soon as you are charged. To talk to a criminal defense attorney right away,  request your consultation or call 813-226-1023 to schedule a call with TJ Grimaldi today.

First-Degree Murder After Fentanyl

[Image via Pinellas County Jail]

A Florida woman overdosed on fentanyl and died. Now, the person who gave her the substance is being charged with first-degree murder.

What happened, and how does Florida law define murder charges for people who provide drugs that turn out to be lethal?

A Fentanyl Overdose Leads to Death

In May 2022, a mother and daughter (whose names have not been released) were driving around Hudson and New Port Richey, Florida with the daughter’s boyfriend, Robert Michelmore. The mother drove the couple to a few locations, including Best Buy.

After their errands, the mother dropped Michelmore off at his home before returning home with her daughter. At that time, the daughter said she was going to watch a movie. Two hours later, the mother went to check on her daughter and found her unresponsive. She called 911, but it was too late. Her daughter had died from a combination of drugs which included fentanyl.

The daughter’s phone was nearby. She had a message from Michelmore that said, “I tried calling you and you wouldn’t answer the phone, how is it?”

According to the Tampa Bay Times, Michelmore later admitted that he put fentanyl in the daughter’s purse while they were at Best Buy. Michelmore had purchased fentanyl the day before, and records show he sent the woman a text at that time saying, “I got some fetty.”

Michelmore later said he warned the woman that the substance was strong and he reportedly told her to only take “a little bit” because he “didn’t want her to die.”

But the woman died, and now, Michelmore is facing the consequences.

Related: If You’re Arrested for a Crime, Immediately Take These 6 Steps

Facing First-Degree Murder Charges

In December 2022, Michelmore was arrested and indicted on a charge of “death caused by the unlawful distribution of fentanyl,” according to Pasco County court records.

Florida has a drug-induced homicide law which states that any person supplying drugs to another person can be charged with homicide if the person dies after using the substance. The law is defined under Florida Statute 782.04(1)(a)(3).

It is a first-degree murder charge, which carries the same potential consequences as premeditated murder or a homicide caused while committing a felony. It is the most serious charge of all homicides and is considered a Capital Offense.

Related: How Much Does an Attorney Cost? 8 Factors to Consider

Potential Consequences of First-Degree Murder

In Florida, a conviction of first-degree murder can be punishable by life in prison with no parole. It can also carry the consequence of the death penalty.

It is not very common for prosecutors to seek the death penalty for first-degree murder cases, and it is unlikely Michelmore will face the death penalty. But, the harsh potential consequence shows the severity of the crime committed.

Other Substances Can Lead to First-Degree Murder Charges

Fentanyl is just one type of illegal substance that can lead to a first-degree murder charge if an individual provides it to someone who uses it and dies. According to Florida Statute 782.04(1)(a)(3), the same rules apply to the distribution of:

  • Cocaine
  • Opium or any synthetic or natural salt, compound, derivative, or preparation of opium
  • Methadone
  • Alfentanil
  • Carfentanil
  • Sufentanil
  • Methamphetamine

This list is not exhaustive. The statute also includes, “A controlled substance analog, as described in Florida Statute 893.0356, of any substance specified in sub-subparagraphs a.-i.” The statute includes a long list of other substances that could lead to a first-degree murder charge if their distribution leads to a death.

Michelmore is being held without bail at the Pinellas County jail.

Related: What to Ask During a Free Consultation with a Lawyer

Get the Advice of an Experienced Criminal Defense Attorney

Every person arrested for a crime deserves fair due process as their case weaves its way through the court system. If you have been arrested for a crime and have questions about your case, talk to an experienced criminal defense attorney.

An experienced criminal defense attorney can ensure that you get a fair and just outcome. Don’t go blindly into a criminal case. Get a professional by your side. Talk to TJ Grimaldi today. Request your consultation or call 813-226-1023.

A package of instant macaroni and cheese doesn’t seem like something to lead to a lawsuit. But, a cup of noodles is now at the heart of a lawsuit filed by a Florida woman.

What led to the lawsuit, and why has her attorney filed over 400 lawsuits about food?

The Mac and Cheese Lawsuit

Amanda Ramirez claims she purchased a package of instant Velveeta Shells & Cheese. According to the packaging, the product should be ready in 3 ½ minutes. When Ramirez cooked the food, she realized it took longer than the advertised time. After stirring in the water and waiting for the cheese to thicken, it took more than 3 ½ minutes for the food to be ready to eat.

Ramirez decided to sue over the discrepancy.

Ramirez partnered with New York-based attorney Spencer Sheehan to file a class action lawsuit against Kraft Heinz Company (which owns the Velveeta brand) for what it believes is false advertising. The lawsuit alleges that Kraft Heinz misleads customers and drives them to purchase the product at a higher price due to the perceived convenience.

According to the lawsuit, “As a result of the false and misleading representations, the Product is sold at a premium price, approximately no less than $10.99 for eight 2.39 oz cups, excluding tax and sales, higher than similar products, represented in a non-misleading way, and higher than it would be sold for absent the misleading representations and omissions.”

As reported by NPR, the 15-page class action lawsuit seeks over $5 million in damages to cover consumers in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah, New Mexico, Alaska, Iowa, Tennessee, and Virginia.

Related: Dealing With the Media During a High-Profile Case: What to Expect

A Pattern of Food-Related Lawsuits

The mac and cheese lawsuit isn’t the first time Sheehan has filed a lawsuit related to false advertising in food products.

According to NPR, Sheehan has filed more than 400 lawsuits related to mislabeling and misrepresenting food products.

Some of Sheehan’s lawsuits include:

  • A lawsuit against Frito-Lay for not using enough real lime juice in its “hint of lime” Tostitos.
  • A lawsuit against Snack Pack pudding for saying it is “made with real milk” when it is actually made with fat-free skim milk.
  • A lawsuit against Pop Tarts for misrepresenting the amount of fruit in strawberry Pop Tarts.
  • Roughly 120 lawsuits against food companies that say their products are “vanilla” while including no actual vanilla bean.

Some of Sheehan’s hundreds of cases have been dismissed by judges, but many others have been voluntarily dismissed.

When a case is voluntarily dismissed, the plaintiff terminates the lawsuit. It is typically a result of the two sides coming to an agreement out of court. In those cases, the defendant often pays the plaintiff to end the lawsuit.

In class action lawsuits with many plaintiffs, each plaintiff doesn’t usually take home a significant amount of money if they win or settle a case. But, Sheehan’s cases could be lucrative for him as the plaintiff’s attorney.

According to Bonnie Patten of Truth In Advertising, “The vast majority of consumers will get absolutely nothing, and a very small percentage will get next to nothing. Generally, the plaintiff’s attorney will be taking home between 25 and 33%.”

Related: What’s the Difference Between a Civil and Criminal Case? 

Food Lawsuits Now and Then

Sheehan isn’t the first person to file class action lawsuits related to the false advertising of food products. It has happened recently and decades ago.

Just one month before the mac and cheese lawsuit, Matthew Sinatro and Jessica Prost filed a class action lawsuit against Barilla, a pasta making company. The lawsuit alleges that Barilla engages in false advertising by featuring the slogan “Italy’s #1 Brand of Pasta” on pasta boxes, even though the pasta is not made in Italy. Barilla moved to dismiss the case in August, but the judge denied the request. The case is still currently moving through the legal system.

Lawsuits over misrepresentation in food packaging and advertising go as far back as the early ‘90s.

In 1991, Richard Overton sued Anheuser-Busch for false and misleading advertising. Overton said commercials for Anheuser-Busch beers featured, “scenic tropical settings [and] beautiful women and men engaged in endless and unrestricted merriment.” He said this image turned out to be “untrue.” The beer commercials depicted a fantasy that wasn’t what you got when you consumed the product.

Overton said the misrepresentation caused him emotional distress, mental and physical injury, and over $10,000 in financial losses. The beer case was dismissed.

Related: What to Ask During a Free Consultation with a Lawyer

Get Serious Legal Representation

While some legal cases may seem silly, there is nothing silly about being involved in a legal matter.

If you find yourself facing legal issues, talk to an attorney right away. Find a trusted lawyer who will fight for you to get the best possible outcome, whether you’re facing civil or criminal charges. To get legal advice right away, schedule a call with TJ Grimaldi. All consultations are free. Request your appointment or call 813-226-1023 now.

In early November, a tragedy occurred when a 10-year-old fell from a motorized scooter and was killed in Tampa, Florida. He was a passenger riding on the scooter, and the driver is facing charges for the accident.

What led to the terrible accident, and what consequences await the driver?

An Awful Accident

On November 10, 2022, around 6:40 p.m., 37-year-old Yordanis Leyva was driving a motorized scooter in Tampa, Florida. On the scooter with him was a 10-year-old boy, who has not been named. The boy and the man knew each other, but the details of their relationship have not been released.

As reported by the Tampa Bay Times, Leyva made a wide turn to pull into a gas station at 3605 West Hillsborough Ave. He took the turn too wide and caused the two riders to fall to the ground in the path of oncoming traffic. A driver didn’t see them on the road and ran them over.

Both Leyva and the boy were taken to a nearby hospital. Leyva was seriously injured, and the boy died from his injuries.

Who Is at Fault for the Accident?

Investigators pointed blame at the driver of the scooter, not the driver of the car who hit the two riders. Leyva, the scooter driver, was intoxicated at the time of the accident and is accused of being at fault for the accident.

Leyva was arrested on charges of DUI manslaughter and driving with a suspended license involving a death.

According to ABC Action News, this isn’t the first time Leyva has been arrested for driving under the influence. In 2019, Leyva was arrested for a DUI. At that time, Leyva was pulled over after police saw him driving erratically, weaving side to side and stopping in the roadway.

Related: How Long Does a DUI Stay on Your Record?

What Charges Does the Driver Face?

In Florida, DUI laws are directed under Florida Statutes 316.193. Under the statutes:

  • A DUI leading to serious bodily harm is classified as a third-degree felony. It can come with penalties of up to five years in prison, up to five years probation, and a $5,000 fine.
  • A DUI resulting in death is a second-degree felony that comes with a mandatory prison sentence of four years. The maximum sentence is 15 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

Because the boy died from his injuries, Leyva faces DUI manslaughter charges. He faces up to 15 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

Since it is Leyva’s second DUI, he may face additional consequences.

In Florida, a second DUI offense can result in serious criminal penalties. If the DUI took place within five years of the prior DUI, it can result in a minimum 10-day jail sentence.

A second DUI offense can also lead to:

  • Nine months to one year in jail depending on the driver’s BAC
  • One year in jail if the DUI happened while a passenger under 18 was in the vehicle
  • One year in jail if the DUI caused an accident that led to property damage or injury
  • Five years in jail if the DUI caused an accident that led to “serious bodily injury”

Fines for a second DUI can range from $1,000 to $5,000. A second DUI can also lead to license revocation, vehicle impoundment, and the addition of an ignition-locking device on the driver’s vehicle.

Leyva faces serious charges because the second DUI charge led to an accident that caused the death of a minor.

Related: What To Do About a DUI License Suspension in Florida 

Another Scooter Accident in Tampa Bay

This isn’t the first time we’ve covered a manslaughter case involving scooters in the Tampa Bay area. In November 2021, we covered a story about a man who was charged with manslaughter via culpable negligence after he hit and killed a bicyclist while riding an electric scooter in St. Petersburg.

In that case, the driver wasn’t under the influence, but investigators alleged that his negligence caused the accident.

Scooters — whether they are motorized or electric — can lead to charges and accidents as severe as those that involve average-size vehicles.

Related: What to Expect From a First Offense DUI

Facing DUI Charges Is a Serious Matter

What happened on November 10, 2022, is a terrible tragedy that led to the death of a young boy. No person should drive under the influence and put other lives at risk.

Driving under the influence is a serious danger and a serious charge. If you find yourself facing DUI charges, seek legal assistance right away. Everyone deserves fair due process of the law, even in the case of a DUI. If you have been charged with a DUI, talk to a DUI attorney right away. Contact TJ Grimaldi by requesting your free consultation or calling 813-226-1023 today.

Football is a dangerous sport, but it’s not often that we hear about a player who got a season-ending injury on the sideline — or that a player is suing after sustaining a mid-game injury. But, that’s what happened with the case of Broncos linebacker Aaron Patrick.

What happened, and why does Patrick think the NFL and other parties need to be held accountable?

What Happened on the Sideline?

On October 17, 2022, Monday Night Football featured the Los Angeles Chargers and the Denver Broncos. The Broncos were the away team, playing the Chargers on their home field at SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles. The game was close and went into overtime.

During a punt return, Aaron Patrick, a 25-year-old linebacker for the Broncos, attempted to make a tackle on punt returner DeAndre Carter. He ran quickly toward Carter and pushed him out of bounds. As the play ended, Patrick’s momentum carried him into the sideline area. He tried to avoid an NFL official, stepped on mats that covered cords and cables, and fell. Video captured the incident.

According to the New York Post, Patrick says his foot got tangled in the mats and cords. It caused Patrick to fall, bend his knee awkwardly, and tear his ACL.

The injury was season-ending and led to Patrick being placed on injury reserve — and filing a civil lawsuit.

Related: Want to Sue for Personal Injury? Take These 4 Steps

Why Did Patrick File a Civil Lawsuit?

Patrick sustained a season-ending injury when he fell on the sideline. Based on his contract, he could lose thousands of dollars because of the injury.

“Patrick has what is called a ‘split contract,’ which means his $825,000 base salary is reduced to under $500,000 if he suffers an injury that prevents him from playing,” according to ESPN.

Patrick’s civil personal injury lawsuit alleges that the injury limited his earning power. According to his contract, he could lose roughly $325,000.

The lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of California and names the NFL, the Rams, the Chargers, SoFi Stadium, ESPN, and several others, including Kroenke Sports & Entertainment, which owns the Rams and the stadium. It alleges that the defendants were negligent in creating a safe space for players.

Patrick’s agent, Lamont Smith told Tom Pelissero of NFL Media, “I was very disturbed about the way the injury occurred with the carpet being on the sideline like that. His cleat got lodged in the carpet trying to avoid the media person.”

“Player safety should be the foremost of importance to the NFL and its owners. The NFL is a multibillion-dollar sports enterprise and business, and it needs to do everything possible to protect its players from non-contact game injuries,” Patrick’s attorney, William M. Berman said in a statement.

The lawsuit requested unspecified damages, which includes future earning potential and lost bonuses, and requested a jury trial.

Related: Types of Personal Injury Cases: Do You Have a Claim? 

Does Patrick Have a Case?

It isn’t common to see an NFL player sue immediately after an injury sustained during a game. So, does Patrick have a case?

To prove fault in personal injury, Patrick must:

  • Prove the accident was caused by another party. Patrick would need to show that the defendants’ negligence directly led to his sideline fall.
  • Prove the accident led to injury. Patrick will need to show that his season-ending injury is a direct result of the sideline accident.
  • Prove the accident led to damages. Patrick will need to show how he experienced physical, financial, and emotional losses due to the accident.

Details of Patrick’s contract indicate that he could lose roughly $325,000 because the injury led to his season being cut short. The jury will determine if the defendants are responsible for creating an unsafe space that led to Patrick’s injury. They will also decide how much Patrick is due based on physical, financial, and emotional losses caused by the injury.

Related: Personal Injury Compensation: What Can You Fight For?

Find a Personal Injury to Fight for You

If the negligence of another party limits your earning potential, you have a legal right to fight for damages. If you find yourself at a loss due to the negligence of another party, talk to a personal injury attorney right away. Work with a personal injury lawyer who can fight to get what is owed to you.

TJ Grimaldi is an experienced personal injury attorney who will fight for you — and only accept payment if you win your case. See how TJ can help you make a claim to get what is legally owed to you. Request your consultation or call 813-226-1023 today.